This report is a nontechnical swnmary of the energy resources of Arizona intended to accompany the Energy Resources Map of Arizona. Arizona is endowed with a variety of energy resources and potential resources; each is given its own chapter in this report. Chapters are arranged according to the relative importance of each resource to the State, with the most important described first. Coal is discussed first; the next three chapters address hydroelectric power, uranium, and petroleum, the other important traditional energy resources. Geothennal, solar, wind, and biomass energy, usually considered' 'alternative" energy resources, are treated in the last four chapters of this report. They have considerable development potential, but as of 1991 have not been exploited on a significant scale.

The districts delineated in this report are based on Metallic Mineral Districts of Arizona (Ari-zona Geological Survey Map 18) [Keith et al.,1983a], which served as a starting point for this da-tabase. The mineral districts attempt to identify mineralized areas based on geologic character and age of mineralization. This database is an attempt to assign accurate spatial locations to the dis-tricts shown on the Keith et al. [1983a] map, and to provide more in depth information on the geology of the districts. The districts are classified according to the system elaborated in Keith et al. [1983b], a report which was published in conjunction with the Keith et al. [1983a] map. This report discusses definition of the districts, and has a summary of metal production reported to the U.S. Bureau of Mines, and in published sources available as of 1981 [Keith et al., 1983b]. The production data included in the table DistrictDataAZMIN are imported from a previous Arizona Geological Survey database [Welty et al., 1989] that contained the production data from the printed publication [Keith et al., 1983b]. Minor discrepancies with data reported in Keith et al [1983b] are the result of edits to that data made during final production of the published report and not updated in the database version that has been preserved, or are the result of edits, correc-tions and additions that have been made to this database since publication of the original produc-tion summary.

This past year marked a major milestone for AZGS. The 4-year, $22 million National Geothermal Data System (NGDS) project formally ended on December 1, 2014, and with it a special period in AZGS history. This was the largest, most ambitious project we have ever undertaken. We had 45 subcontractors in 45 states and a number of other collaborators and contributors. NGDS is now operational, with 60+ data providers sharing more than 10 million records from all 50 states. We are deploying that same open source, open access data integration framework for a variety of other applications, not only in AZGS but nationally and internationally. This has been a great effort, for the Survey, both technically and financially. The project began just as the recession budget cuts slashed state support, so that today, AZGS is 85–90% funded with grant funds. State funds have been providing less than 10% of our annual budget. The NGDS project allowed the Survey to not only survive but thrive during a period of economic challenges.

The map encompasses a drainage divide that separates the Colorado River catchment from the Red Lake Playa catchment. Valleys consist of gently sloping piedmonts covered by alluvial fan and terrace deposits, and nearly flat valley floors occupied by ephemeral washes, floodplains and low terraces.

The map encompasses a drainage divide that separates the Colorado River catchment from the Red Lake Playa catchment. Valleys consist of gently sloping piedmonts covered by alluvial fan and terrace deposits, and nearly flat valley floors occupied by ephemeral washes, floodplains and low terraces.

The northern Plomosa Mountains are a small metamorphic core complex in La Paz County, western Arizona. The dominant structure of the range is the Plomosa detachment fault, a low-angle normal fault that separates a single tilted footwall block from a highly extended hanging wall with diverse stratigraphy and complex structure. The northern Plomosa Mountains were first mapped by Scarborough and Meader (1983), with later detailed mapping of smaller areas by Stoneman (1985) and Steinke (1997). The Arizona Geological Survey (AZGS) mapped the northern Plomosa Mountains at 1:24,000 scale (Spencer et al., 2014) with funding from the STATEMAP program, a component of the National Geologic Mapping Act of 1992. This field trip is largely a showcase for geology mapped during the AZGS mapping project. On Day 2 we will be visiting several outcrops of the controversial Bouse Formation in the southern part of the Blythe basin. Bouse deposits were first systematically investigated and formally defined as a geologic formation as part of USGS geohydrology investigations along the lower Colorado River (Metzger, 1968; Metzger et al., 1973; Metzger and Loeltz, 1973). These investigations described the basic characteristics of the Bouse Formation, including: (1) basal carbonate deposits including limestone, tufa (travertine) and marl; and (2) much thicker fine-grained siliciclastic deposits consisting of interbedded clay, silt, and quartz-rich sand that are always stratigraphically above the basal carbonate. Based primarily on interpretations that some of the microfauna found in southern Bouse deposits were marine organisms (Smith, 1970), and to a lesser degree on interpretations of sedimentary environments (e.g., Buising, 1990), the Bouse Formation was interpreted to be entirely marine/estuarine.

This bibliography provides references for each known metallic mineral district in La Paz, Mohave, and Yuma Counties in Arizona. In a mineral district classification, known metallic mineral occurrences are grouped according to geologic and metallogenic criteria rather than the geographic associations used in the traditional mining-district approach (Keith and others, 1983a,b). Ideally, a mineral district should consist of mineral occurrences that have a common genesis. A mineral-district classification is especially useful for understanding the geologic setting of mineralization and the distribution of known mineral occurrences with similar geology. A mineral district map, however, is by no means a statement of mineral potential because future mineral discoveries within and outside established districts will affect district boundaries. Although understanding the distribution of known mineral deposits is essential in evaluating mineral potential, many other geologic and technologic factors must also be considered (Fellows, 1984).

The Gene Wash 7.5' Quadrangle is located south of Lake Havasu City and includes part of Mohave and La Paz Counties of western Arizona and San Bernardino County, California. Only the Arizona part of the quadrangle was mapped for this study.

Recent statutory and regulatory changes that affect Federal mining claims have made portions of Special Report 12, Laws and Regulations Governing Mineral Rights in Arizona, 9th Edition inaccurate. Pending the completion of the rewriting of Special Report 12 this circular attempts to briefly describe statutory and agency policy changes in mining claim procedures. These changes are especially pertinent for the information on Federal filing requirements, maintenance of title, surface management regulations, and patenting of claims on pages 28 to 45. Department circulars that describe previous changes are: Arizona Mining Law Change – 1989 (Circular 30) Arizona Recordation Law Change, 1991 (Circular 36) Annual Assessment Work Requirements Under Arizona Statue, 1994 (Circular 56) These circulars, included in Special Report 11, should also be reviewed. It is important for claimants to keep informed as Congress or managing agencies make additional changes to mining law or regulatory procedures.

The public land laws of the United States have created a wide diversity of estates in land, each having its own idiosyncrasies. In addition, the lands in public ownership are subject to daily changes in the applicability of the various public land laws, including the mining laws, by virtue of congressional and administrative withdrawals. It is therefore impossible to publish an accurate statewide land status map that would not be obsolete almost immediately. By following the procedures outlined below, however, a reasonably accurate determination of status can be obtained.